← United States · 2015

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp5-5ab65a4c9af3bad4b05a

BIA Precedent on Subsequent Asylum Filings and REAL ID Act Applicability (Matter of M-A-F-)

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateAugust 21, 2015
CategoryAsylum or protection / adjudication standards
Policy toolLegal interpretation / credibility standards & filing date determination
Affected groupAsylum seekers with amended or renewed applications

Policy effect

The Board of Immigration Appeals held in a binding precedent that when an asylum applicant who filed before the May 11, 2005 effective date of the REAL ID Act submits a subsequent application on or after that date presenting a new basis for relief or substantially different factual basis, the later filing date controls for determining the applicability of section 208(b)(1)(B)(iii) credibility standards and the 1-year statutory filing deadline under section 208(a)(2)(B). Phase scope: Nationwide across all EOIR Immigration Courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Conditions and exceptions

Validated condition or limit: The Board of Immigration Appeals held in a binding precedent that when an asylum applicant who filed before the May 11, 2005 effective date of the REAL ID Act submits a subsequent application on or after that date presenting a new basis for relief or substantially different factual basis, the later filing date controls for determining the applicability of section 208(b)(1)(B)(iii) credibility standards and the 1-year statutory filing deadline under section 208(a)(2)(B).

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

(1) Where an applicant has filed an asylum application before the May 11, 2005, effective date of the REAL ID Act of 2005, Division B of Pub. L. No. 109-13, 119 Stat. 302, and, on or after that date, submitted a subsequent application that is properly viewed as a new application, the later filing date controls for purposes of determining the applicability of section 208(b)(1)(B)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii) (2012), to credibility determinations. (2) A subsequent asylum application is properly viewed as a new application if it presents a previously unraised basis for relief or is predicated on a new or substantially different factual basis.
justice.govMatter of M-A-F-, 26 I&N Dec. 651 (BIA 2015)Open official source
Retrieved from https://justice.gov/eoir/file/762676/dl?inline=

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-5ab65a4c9af3bad4b05a. Something wrong? Flag this record.