← United States · 2018

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp5-0e83e63cc55942f801d8

Standards for Continuances to Pursue Collateral Relief in Removal Proceedings (Matter of L-A-B-R-)

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateAugust 16, 2018
CategoryRemoval proceedings / enforcement
Policy toolLegal interpretation / binding administrative case law
Affected groupNoncitizens in removal proceedings seeking continuances to await collateral relief

Policy effect

The Attorney General issued a binding precedent decision establishing a multifactor legal standard governing motions for continuances under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. The decision limits immigration judges' discretion when a respondent requests a continuance to pursue collateral relief outside immigration court, requiring the adjudicator to focus primarily on the likelihood that the collateral relief will be granted and will materially affect the outcome of the removal proceedings. Phase scope: Nationwide EOIR immigration courts and Board of Immigration Appeals proceedings

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

(1) An immigration judge may grant a motion for a continuance of removal proceedings only “for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. (2) The good-cause standard is a substantive requirement that limits the discretion of immigration judges and prohibits them from granting continuances for any reason or no reason at all. (3) The good-cause standard requires consideration and balancing of multiple relevant factors when a respondent alien requests a continuance to pursue collateral relief from another authority—for example, a visa from the Department of Homeland Security. See Matter of Hashmi, 24 I&N Dec. 785, 790 (BIA 2009). (4) When a respondent requests a continuance to pursue collateral relief, the immigration judge must consider primarily the likelihood that the collateral relief will be granted and will materially affect the outcome of the removal proceedings.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney GeneralMatter of L-A-B-R- et al., 27 I&N Dec. 405 (A.G. 2018)Open official source
Retrieved from https://justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1087781/dl

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-0e83e63cc55942f801d8. Something wrong? Flag this record.