← United States · 2018

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp5-3539ca089bee01a54bef

Vacatur of Requirement for Full Evidentiary Hearings in Asylum Claims (Matter of E-F-H-L-)

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateMarch 5, 2018
CategoryAsylum and refugee protection / removal defense
Policy toolLegal interpretation / binding administrative precedent
Affected groupAsylum seekers in removal proceedings

Policy effect

The Attorney General referred to himself and vacated the 2014 Board of Immigration Appeals precedent in Matter of E-F-H-L-, eliminating the binding requirement that asylum and withholding of removal applicants are ordinarily entitled to a full evidentiary hearing on the merits before an Immigration Judge without needing to establish a prima facie case on the written application alone. Phase scope: Nationwide across all EOIR Immigration Courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals

Conditions and exceptions

Validated condition or limit: The Attorney General referred to himself and vacated the 2014 Board of Immigration Appeals precedent in Matter of E-F-H-L-, eliminating the binding requirement that asylum and withholding of removal applicants are ordinarily entitled to a full evidentiary hearing on the merits before an Immigration Judge without needing to establish a prima facie case on the written application alone.

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

The presiding Immigration Judge determined, without holding an evidentiary hearing, that the respondent’s application failed as a matter of law to make a prima facie case that he was eligible for asylum and withholding of removal, and he denied the application. The respondent appealed on the merits to the Board. The Board remanded, holding that a respondent applying for asylum and withholding of removal was ordinarily entitled to a full evidentiary hearing.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney GeneralMatter of E-F-H-L-, 27 I&N Dec. 226 (A.G. 2018)Open official source
Retrieved from https://justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1040936/dl

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-3539ca089bee01a54bef. Something wrong? Flag this record.